Checking Eenadu vs Sakshi'sBiassed Reporting

CID petitioned the High Court for additional conditions for temporary baileeChandrababu Naidu. Two DSPs must monitor him and prevent him from speaking to the media or holding rallies.

Sakshi bends things to suit YSR Congress's political objective, according to the study. What happened in court: To determine the outcome, notice key points. 1. The inquiry agency should explain its concern with the respondent/petitioner's political activities. It should also describe how political activity conditions would aid the investigation.

According to point 19 of the judgement, this Court strongly supports the respondent's claim that any extra criteria should serve the investigation. 2. It is clear that the respondent is TDP National President. His right to voice his opinions as he did before his detention does not end just because interim bail was granted on health reasons.

Sakshi overlooked all three paras in the judgement that sided with Chandrababu and reported the comment that interim bail consideration would have been different if bail was sought for political rallies. Sakshi misrepresented and accentuated this statement to give the impression that Chandrababu lost the judgement. Eenadu, however, reported the judgement as a media house would.